Re: documentation x executable code

[Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:54:38AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:36:02PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > "wannabe-Holier-Than-Stallman zealots" is not a rebuttal, it's merely a
> > succinct description of the anti-GFDL crowd.
> 
> Not agreeing with you does not necessarily make people zealots.  

i never said it did.

being insanely pedantic & obsessive about licensing trivialities does,
however, make one a zealot.


> Because that's the only kind of "modification by patch" that the GFDL
> allows for.

"patch" is not restricted to the controlling input to patch(1) - or
to any particular program or method.

craig

-- 
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>           (part time cyborg)