On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:27:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > So, it's been three weeks, without any word that I've seen. > > Now it's been four weeks since the delegation, a month since I > suggested Branden delegate this, and just under two months since > Florian Weimer brought the subject to this list's attention, and > there's _still_ been no response to the developers. This is primarily because there still is nothing concrete to report.[1] I will be preparing a summary of what has happened and is happening shortly; until that time, please bear with me as I attempt to resolve this issue without enflaming the situtation[2] further. > My understanding is it's necessary to rigorously enforce your > trademark to ensure it doesn't lapse. This doesn't seem to be what's > happening here. The few dozen e-mails that I have sent between myself and the representatives of the DCCA are reasonable evidence of Debian's desire to protect the Debian mark. Don Armstrong 1: Concrete in this situtation being a final resolution of the issues with the usage of the trademark. 2: Unfortunatly, many of the individuals involved are extraordinarily busy, so things have not moved forward at the speed I had envisioned originally; reagrdless, communication is occuring. -- The beauty of the DRUNKENNESS subprogram was that you could move your intoxication level up and down at will, instead of being caught on a relentless down escalator to bargain basement philosophy and the parking garage. -- Rudy von Bitter _Software_ p124 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature