On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:17:28PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > [...] There's no need to hammer on the trust issues in public; I tend to think "in public" is the best place to hammer on trust issues; otherwise how to tell the difference between a convincing argument, or the appropriate people getting bored, threatened or bought off? Finding out which of those is the case seems pretty crucial to resolving trust issues, afaics. > better perhaps to focus > scrutiny on the substance of their proposals to "improve" upon the > Debian base. I haven't seen any such proposals (beyond "add LSB compliance" and "new X"); I wouldn't really expect to either -- far easier and better to just make the improvements, license them freely, and put them out for use and comment simultaneously. Which is to say, create a fork. But maybe I've just missed them. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature