[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Pledge To Killfile Andrew Suffield

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
>Andrew Suffield writes:
>>On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:09:16PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>>>My response is simply this: it's lies. I challenge anybody who
>>>thinks otherwise to present evidence.
>>So far (three days) we've had one person try, and give up after I
>>explained every case. I think that says a lot for the accuracy of the
>It says a lot more about how much you regularly misrepresent plain
>writing to put your spin on issues.  You think you rebutted my
>arguments; I think you actually illustrated that I was correct from
>the start.  The real reason I gave up is that it is clear that neither
>of us is convincing the other.
>Descending to your flawed level of rhetoric,

What are the flaws?

>it is also telling that nobody else has stepped up to argue that
>your posts were acceptable.

Why is that? Is it because asuffield is doing a good job defending

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: