Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:51:58PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * David Nusinow <email@example.com> [2005-03-14 12:47]:
> > Perhaps you're right. I honestly hadn't considered an etch virtual
> > package. My goal has been to automate the process as much as
> > possible, with certain ideas that extend beyond what debbugs
> > currently provides. I suppose I could hack on debbugs itself to
> > provide those features, but from what I understand it's an
> > incredibly difficult codebase to work with. Then again, if debbugs
> > is sufficient then there's no need for me to do duplicate work,
> > which would be nice.
> Bugzilla has the concept of a bug depending on another bug (or bugs)
> which is commonly used to track release issues and progress. I think
> they also have nice visualization tools to show the dependency tree.
Thanks Martin! I'll have a look.
Hmpf. At the rate I'm going, maybe I should just look in to writing
- David Nusinow