Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
* David Nusinow <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-03-14 12:47]:
> Perhaps you're right. I honestly hadn't considered an etch virtual
> package. My goal has been to automate the process as much as
> possible, with certain ideas that extend beyond what debbugs
> currently provides. I suppose I could hack on debbugs itself to
> provide those features, but from what I understand it's an
> incredibly difficult codebase to work with. Then again, if debbugs
> is sufficient then there's no need for me to do duplicate work,
> which would be nice.
Bugzilla has the concept of a bug depending on another bug (or bugs)
which is commonly used to track release issues and progress. I think
they also have nice visualization tools to show the dependency tree.