On Thursday 10 February 2005 19:42, Luk Claes wrote: > > I've removed the controversal bits (website and nearest city) from the > > policy. Would this version be alright to use? > > No, because than the 'Some parts of the consultant's information can be > removed if they don't comply with this policy anymore.' is too weak > unless there is mentioned that the consultant with an URL has to explain > his/her consultant work on that URL, IMHO. Hi, should we just drop that part as well, then? Or do you have another suggestion? Cheers, -- Tobias Never trust a man who can count to 1023 on his fingers.
Description: PGP signature