also sprach martin f krafft <email@example.com> [2005.02.15.1101 +0100]: > > I'd rather have this discussion on debian-devel or debian-dpkg > > since that's a logical place where more people are able to get > > involved and find the archive much easier than a strangely named > > list on the mad duck site. > > Mh, as you wish... sorry for trying to be productive. I'll remove > the list. Should Florian decide on a separate discussion forum, > then lists.alioth.debian.org it should be. Reflecting on this, you are (of course) right, Joey. We should always try to remain as open as possible and not segregate into groups and thus make it harder for people to stay on top of development. Obviously, for reasons unknown to the mere mortals, the above only applies to topics of the mere mortals of Debian, not to certain members of the cabal. Some vital components of the Debian project are better kept away from the public, or they could be flooded with opinions or suggestions for improvement, or even <gasp> help (ftpmasters, are you listening?). Such parts of the Debian project should be handled (if at all) in the cellar, far away from public view. And thou shalt not ever report to the outside, so that the broad public gets the impression that, in fact, you do not exist. Yay for public development. Let's keep discussion about APT 0.6 visible to everyone! Sorry for creating the list in the first place. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature