* Michael Stone (mstone@debian.org) wrote: > This is something that should be handled at the pam level and shouldn't > require special handling from ssh. (Assuming a good ssh pam > implementation.) The last time I looked at the securid pam module from > rsa it didn't work with our ssh, but that's because they made it > dependent on bugs in ssh pam handling from older versions of ssh. > <shrug> That's unfortunate. Do you know of any workarounds? We're seriously considering using RSA secureid with ssh (and quite possibly other things via pam...). Has RSA acknowledged this or said anything about correcting it? Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature