* MJ Ray (mjr@dsl.pipex.com) wrote: > The restrictions permitted by a *registered* trademark are oppressive > and Debian should not use them. Furthermore, it should not use > copyright licences to police its logos because it is then promoting > non-free software. They're not oppressive and Debian certainly *should* use them to avoid dillution of the Debian mark. Provided trademark law handles all the situations we need it to, I agree that we shouldn't need to have a restrictive copyright license. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature