Re: Your mom won't move the thread for you
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25-12-2004 23:38, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 12:38:39AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>On 24-12-2004 23:44, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>>[bla bla comment on an earlier post, and then...:]
>>
>>>Anyway, this discussion should be on -project.
>>
>>Please post your point at the proper list - noone will do it for you.
>>
>>Responding and then complaining solves nothing IMHO.
>>
>>
>> - Jonas
>>
>>P.S.
>>
>>I took the liberty to quote your private text in public, even though you
>>did not (explicitly) permitted it.
>>
>>Also, I cross-posted this mail for those too lazy to subscribe to
>>- -project (it is a sad fact that -private is promoted by being the only
>>list subscribed by default). Please follow up only on -project.
>>
>>What I wrote here is not private: I hereby permit my parts of this email
>>to be quoted anywhere - preferrably in public.
>>
>>Please join the recent thread on -project to help define a simpler way
>>to promote non-privacy than this!
>
>
> What's the point in reposting this on -project if "this discussion" is
> totally undefined for people on -project?
Any discussion taking place on -private but belonging to a public list
is a violation of our social contract.
The point of posting to -project is to invite possible further
discussion about this (wether you, your mom or someone else is
responsible for moving a thread that does not belong to -private) to
take place on -project rather than -private.
Does it make sense now?
How would it make sense to have this very conversation on -private?!?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBzjMin7DbMsAkQLgRAkW6AJsFOsctAmHj1G+8Kj8QQfFVgCSEJwCfQVYF
QmF2HZ7BdhIi9evGR1Sc+kY=
=y/Nc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: