Re: Do we need a debian-infrastructure list?
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I for myself would be quite happy with most of them at d-d-a (at least
> all permanent messages as "services moved", "host (un)restricted",
> ...), because they have more or less the same audience as d-d-a.
> "Temporary" messages are IMHO quite good announced in d-d, together
> with an appropriate irc-topic. (And whoever ignores the few messages
> of a debian-admin-member to d-d probably is also not hit by temporary
Depending on the traffic, if it's low I see nothing against d-d-a, and
if it'd be high, weekly summaries of what happens in d-d-a linked to
messages in -devel may do the trick.