Bug#97671: marked as done (xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +1000
with message-id <20030725114022.GA9410@azure.humbug.org.au>
and subject line Bug#97671: tech ctte resolution requested re: severity of bug#97671/143825
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2001 11:53:55 +0000
>From email@example.com Wed May 16 06:53:55 2001
Received: from cirkus.samfundet.no [188.8.131.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14zzsJ-0005m4-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:53:55 -0500
Received: from gagatan.samfundet.no (gagatan.samfundet.no [184.108.40.206])
by cirkus.samfundet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5099A8015
for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:53:54 +0000 (CET)
Received: from arabella.pvv.org (ti29a64-0233.dialup.online.no [220.127.116.11])
by gagatan.samfundet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B60B39665
for <email@example.com>; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:53:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by arabella.pvv.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 82423E91; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:53:51 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Sender: Tollef Fog Heen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?ELF=A0file?= as conffile?
From: Tollef Fog Heen <email@example.com>
Date: 16 May 2001 13:53:51 +0200
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It seems like /etc/X11/rstart/rsartd.real is both an ELF file and
conffile. This seems strange to me - and what is a runnable, compiled
program doing in /etc? Shouldn't that go into /usr/X11R6 somewhere?
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
Received: (at 97671-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 11:40:37 +0000
>From firstname.lastname@example.org Fri Jul 25 06:40:34 2003
Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure) [18.104.22.168]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19g0w5-000853-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:40:33 -0500
Received: from aj by azure with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for <email@example.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:33 +1000
Received: from aj by cyan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:23 +1000
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +1000
Subject: Re: Bug#97671: tech ctte resolution requested re: severity of bug#97671/143825
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
X-No-CC: Don't Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to
From: Anthony Towns <email@example.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.0 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (22.214.171.124-2003-03-30-exp)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Ian Jackson, as tech ctte chairman, wrote:
> The Technical Committee has already referred this question to the
> Bug System Administrators and the Project Leadership. Quoting from
> our resolution on the matter:
Branden Robinson, in a mail to firstname.lastname@example.org, wrote:
> merge 97671 143825
> severity normal
> tag 97671 + help upstream
As the tech ctte have resolved not to do anything about this bug,
and two project leaders have refrained from touching it at all, you're
evidently not going to get a more authoritative judgement on the severity
of Bug#143825, than mine whether taken as either release manager or one
of the BTS maintainers. If you choose not to accept this, and cannot
get either the tech ctte or the DPL to actively support your position
overruling my judgement, but try to downgrade the bug nevertheless,
I'll add technical measures to stop that from happening. I'd appreciate
it if you refrain from wasting my time or your own in such a manner.
Closing this report with this message.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Is this some kind of psych test?
Am I getting paid for this?''
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----