[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LSB Compliance



On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:48:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:42:54PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > We _do_ plan to be LSB compliant eventually.  We are, in general, very
> > strong believers in open standards.  But the LSB is not our top
> > priority at the moment, because it's not something our users are
> > demanding.  
> 
> ``From my vantage point (as both business person and technologist) the
> LSB standards are important as moving between vendors is that much less
> painful.  It's one of the reasons I went with Red Hat among distros -
> although now, for other reasons, I would like to move to Debian.''
> 
> Isn't this whole thread about our users demanding it?

From the point of view of another user, yes it is.  LSB compliance
would be a good thing.

Yeah I know, I should get off my ass and help.

-- 
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@incanus.net
  No.
  > Should I include quotations after my reply?

Attachment: pgpkIQFv5lraj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: