On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:48:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:42:54PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > > We _do_ plan to be LSB compliant eventually. We are, in general, very > > strong believers in open standards. But the LSB is not our top > > priority at the moment, because it's not something our users are > > demanding. > > ``From my vantage point (as both business person and technologist) the > LSB standards are important as moving between vendors is that much less > painful. It's one of the reasons I went with Red Hat among distros - > although now, for other reasons, I would like to move to Debian.'' > > Isn't this whole thread about our users demanding it? From the point of view of another user, yes it is. LSB compliance would be a good thing. Yeah I know, I should get off my ass and help. -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org No. > Should I include quotations after my reply?
Description: PGP signature