Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
Anthony> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:38:36PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Since they are not derived from the one true editor. Apart from
>> being a name calling moron, you have no humour gene.
Anthony> Oddly enough, idiocy within Debian doesn't leave me
Anthony> particularly amused any more, whether it's faked or comes
Anthony> naturally. "Too much of a good thing", and all that.
Odd. Humor. Idiocy. All same.
Anthony> Do you at least have the intellectual honesty to note that
Anthony> your mail differed from Ian's on three grounds: that he was
Anthony> serious about his proposal, that he believed the people who
Anthony> he was proposing jointly issue it would agree with it, and
Anthony> that he had no intention of having anyone assume that the
Anthony> draft was written by anyone other than him?
Intellectual honesty? Do I have to pound you on the head to
drive the first two points across?
a) and b) -- the message said that it was not really a joint
message (draft or otherwise) in so many words.
>>> This is a joint draft message from the release manager and Manoj
>>> Srivastava .... Of course it is not, really.
And after all that you can imagine that I intended people to
assume the draft was written by anyone than me, I owe you an apology:
I have no right to enter into an intellectual debate with an unarmed
Good Day, Sir.
I believe we are done.
If I were a grave-digger or even a hangman, there are some people I
could work for with a great deal of enjoyment. Douglas Jerrold
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C