[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me



On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:38:39AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:03:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Maybe a GR really is the best way to go; we may find out that we can't
> > even muster quorum on the issue, and that Ian, Manoj, and I have all
> > inflated notions of the importance of this issue.  Maybe most developers
> > are willing to put up with the flamewars we have.
> 
> I think it's an exercise in futility, does that count?
> 
> It's a game that fails if any of the players don't play fair, or take
> things personally.

To what are you referring?  Debian flamewars in general, or Ian's draft?

(Or both? :) )

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     Organized religion is a sham and a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     crutch for weak-minded people who
branden@debian.org                 |     need strength in numbers.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Jesse Ventura

Attachment: pgpupH2N9FLI8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: