On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:21:46PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:23:23AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > > - Destructive help - This person shouldn't ever touch my packages again > > > Heh. Someone fucking up bash's essential behaviour comes to mind. It > > > happened once. > > Yeah, screw you too. > Well, I did not even know who did that. See the changelog entries for versions 2.02.1-1.7 and -1.8, and the bugs listed. > > (Actually it's happened more than once. Hey, guess why we have "unstable"?) > We should NOT allow a game to somehow get people to be more daring when > making NMU, so bad NMUs should be punished in the game since good NMUs > are encouraged. No, but sometimes no one realises what's going to break until it does, which was the case for at least that bash problem (and nothing did break, as long as you used apt; it was only when you didn't use apt, and were upgrading multiple packages at once, that you had a problem). There's no point being too heavy handed about it: people making NMUs stuff up quite regularly, the important thing is making sure they take every precaution not to stuff up in the first place, and that when they do stuff up, they fix it. In which case, I think the "bash" example is a fairly bad one to use, if you were referring to that time anyway. Like I said, there were others (although I don't know if any were NMUs). Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature