On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 22:48, Daniel Stone wrote:
> #iamacow and, later, OFTC. (Luckily, OFTC has so far mostly avoid
> becoming another lilofree.net).
You know that argument about lilofree.net is a total sham. I *know* the
people who run lilofree and their 'deal'.
lilofree is more about a specific person who has a certain need to
socially engineer everything for bad. He has a following (not including
myself) who thinks that the OPN staff took a paticularly harsh action to
this sort of activity. They created another network because too many of
them didn't want to not-be-around this single person.
Calling it a network, comparing it to the aims of OFTC, and throwing it
into some of the arguments is a great way to show off your want to
muddle the issues via emotions rather than facts.
Scott Dier <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.ringworld.org/