[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: irc.debian.org

On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 22:48, Daniel Stone wrote:
> #iamacow and, later, OFTC. (Luckily, OFTC has so far mostly avoid
> becoming another lilofree.net).

You know that argument about lilofree.net is a total sham.  I *know* the
people who run lilofree and their 'deal'.

lilofree is more about a specific person who has a certain need to
socially engineer everything for bad.  He has a following (not including
myself) who thinks that the OPN staff took a paticularly harsh action to
this sort of activity.  They created another network because too many of
them didn't want to not-be-around this single person.

Calling it a network, comparing it to the aims of OFTC, and throwing it
into some of the arguments is a great way to show off your want to
muddle the issues via emotions rather than facts.

Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> http://www.ringworld.org/

Reply to: