Re: Debian Organization
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian Organization
- From: davidw@dedasys.com (David N. Welton)
- Date: 04 Feb 2002 00:46:23 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 878zaayvqo.fsf@dedasys.com>
- In-reply-to: <20020204013214.69995f32.bug1@optushome.com.au>
- References: <3C5CD418.7010903@cfl.rr.com> <E16XNi8-0000hP-00.2002-02-03-14-33-43@mail4.svr.pol.co.uk> <20020203145521.GB5758@marvin.xmldesign.de> <20020204013214.69995f32.bug1@optushome.com.au>
Glenn McGrath <bug1@optushome.com.au> writes:
> Being a debian developer means your making a commitment to improving
> debian in the long term. Sending in one bugfix does help debian, but
> we shouldnt necessarily expect assisntance from this person in the
> future.
> Many people tell potential developers "you dont need to be one of us
> to contribute".. in my mind "contributing makes you one of us".
Maybe we should change from a 'push' to a 'pull' architecture. In
other words, when you start contributing a lot to Debian, and get
noticed, then someone in Debian proposes you as a new maintainer.
This might have the potential to eliminate a lot of the beaurocratic
bullshit that goes on right now, in that we wouldn't have to worry
about running people through all kinds of crap. When we find a good
one, we invite them on board.
This might also have the potential to eliminate a certain category of
whining...
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
Reply to: