Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
[snip]
>I too would be forced to use another dist if the non-free software was no
>longer maintained by debian.
this is wrong. Redhat only have ONE cd as their well-organized
distro, other packages are added by others (even w/o a policy
for quality), while Debian, even the GR passed, could still
gives you more. (3rd parties could still give you the packages
you needed.)
So your point on anti-the-GR is meanless here.
(BTW, i'm still thinking about the GR, and get some
enlightenments from both side, and I appreciate
it. But obviouslly here quite some meaningless
arguments against the GR here.)
___________________________________________________________________
ÐÂÏÊÈÈÀ±µÄ³±Á÷×ÊѶ£¬ÍøÒ×ÐÂÀ±Channel£º http://spicy.163.com
ÉÁ¿Í¾«Æ·£¬¾¡ÔÚÍøÒ×FLASHÕ¾£º http://desktop.163.com/flash
Reply to: