[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: incremental release process (the package pool)



On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 04:41:50AM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 10:45:42PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Note that todays technology eliminates the need for a ftp hierarchy that
> > resembles the architectural design of our software hierarchy. Most people
> > are accessing packages through apt, web interface or similar.
> > So we can have a real, physical pool of any sort, and all distributions are
> simply a packages file with the relevant constellation.
> Makes a lot of sense, but that also means making apt mandatory.

It also means finding some way of choosing which packages should be in
which Packages file. Currently we use dpkg-scanpackages and physically
move files around (ie, this is yet more scripts to be written).

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

 ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it 
        results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
                                        -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: pgp2OiVkR49ce.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: