Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05
On 08/25/2013 09:10 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
>> On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
>>>> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken
>>>> from the system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not
>>>> know whether all of these libraries are actually available in
>>>> Debian or whether there are some being newer in Ubuntu than in
>>>> Debian or not in Debian at all, as I did not package these
>>>> libraries for Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> I have packages GS 9.09 for Ubuntu with a ~dfsg source tarball not
>>>> containing any of the convenience library code copies. There are
>>>> also no source code patches (only some build system patches which
>>>> most probably are known to you).
>>>>
>>>> You can find the package and the source tarball for backmerging to
>>>> Debian on
>>>>
>>>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.09~dfsg-0ubuntu1
>>>
>>> You write above that Ghostscript 9.09 builds on Ubuntu.
>>>
>>> I am quite interested in learning which versions of libraries you
>>> have succesfully build against, but fail to locate _succesful_ build
>>> logs from Ubuntu (but found a few failing ones - missing
>>> build-dependency).
>>>
>>> Could you perhaps provide me a URL to a succesful build log?
>>
>> I have built it on my local machine running a fully up-to-date Saucy.
>> The build server is not able to build it because the libopenjpeg
>> package is not in Ubuntu Main, but only in Universe. It is in the
>> process to be transferred to Main, but this takes longer than
>> expected.
>
> Yes, I am aware of the libopenjpeg issue. Specifically I was curious
> about the verison of liblcms2-dev, but might have interest also in other
> dependencies - that's why I generally asked for a build log.
>
>
> - Jonas
>
liblcm2 is version 2.5.
Till
Reply to: