On 12-07-24 at 06:36pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of > ghostscript problem. > > Instead of printing numeric error ghostscript will print > strerror(error). > > It is a one liner quite safe because code path is tested on dos and > windows (please do not laugth). > > Now: > * do you think this patch is worthwhile ? > * do you think we could convince the release team to get it [1]. I think it sounds like a good idea, but do not see it as crucial and prefer if you could persuade upstream to adopt it and not carry a local patch for it. ...and I do not see it as important for a freeze exception, but don't mind you trying, if you insist. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature