[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly



On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> wrote:
> On 12-07-24 at 01:52pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> Ok I am member of collab maint.
>
> Good.
>
> Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc.
>
>
>> BTW I see taht you hve managed to get some of my documentation patch
>> applied.
>>
>> How do you apply patch ?
>>
>> I like cdbs so I will use it. Do you want some problem if I maintain a
>> branch named debian-patches/version ? It will ease patching
>> generation, only a matter of git rebase with new version....
>>
>> For imagemagick I use gitpkg and it is further automatized, but I do
>> not know if it apply here. gitpkg saved me a lot for patch mismerge
>> and patch misorder...
>
> I use quilt to handle patches.  Possibly gitpkg is better, but I am
> unfamiliar with it as of yet.  Don't switch to using that before I have
> become familiar with it.
>
> Generally, please do *not* change packaging style without consent!
>
> I notice that you've added a patch branch to the ghostscript git -
> please remove that again.

Could not
remote: *** Deleting a branch is not allowed in this repository
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/debian-patches/9.05_dfsg-6

I could modifiy the hook temporarly if needed, but branch are cheap.
Will do if you insist.

I have not planed to modify your packaging. The patch queue is only
here because I use git in local to refresh the patch, and I beleive it
is useful for other to review current patch queue.

BTW could I add under unreleased distrib in the changelog ?

Thanks

This queue
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


Reply to: