tags 582522 + patch thanks On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote: > retitle 582522 please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly > # documentation > severity 582522 minor > found 582522 ghostscript/9.05~dfsg-6 > quit > > Hi Bastien, > > Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> Now that README.Debian has some comment about the case, time to >> close ? > > All the README.Debian says is "Some valid PostScript and PDF files > will fail to parse due to some (old, presumably?) Adobe interpreters > violating the JPEG standard", which is not even true. (It's > presumably due to the programs generating the invalid JPEGs, which > were neither postscript interpreters nor written by Adobe. Though no > one seems to have found any examples triggering this.) Wouldn't it > make sense to make the README reflect what was already discovered in > the history of this report? > > Thanks, > Jonathan Ok see patch >
Attachment:
582522.patch
Description: Binary data