On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 10:03 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> writes: > > On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 07:10 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > > As far as I know powerpc isn't supported for Debian stable nor the > > Debian security updates archive. > > Interesting -- where can I read about that? The release notes says that > ppc64el is an officially supported architecture for Debian 11: Your initial mail mentioned powerpc, which is the older 32-bit port, while you are using the newer ppc64el port, which is supported. > Isn't the problem that somehow the package from > bullseye-proposed-updates-debug was prefered over the one from > bullseye-debug? For security updates you want that, for updates to > stable you don't want that. Maybe there should be a > bullseye-updates-debug distribution? That is the correct analysis yeah. The wiki page you linked has a bug about adding a dbgsym archive for the debian-security archive, but there hasn't been any work done on it at all yet, so I doubt the issue will be fixed any time soon. For now I suggest either dropping the b-p-u-d from your apt sources or pinning them to low priority and only ever installing them manually. You could also add the non-debug suite bullseye-proposed-updates to your apt sources, but then you would get additional low-priority updates ahead of the point releases. https://bugs.debian.org/894081 https://wiki.debian.org/AptConfiguration#apt_preferences_.28APT_pinning.29 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part