Re: Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'
- To: PowerPC List Debian <debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'
- From: Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 07:28:31 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1478240701@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- In-reply-to: <56867E43-0882-4C3A-AA92-C9474C72EF38@gmail.com>
- References: <20161031133116.GA5290@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <CA+7wUszVzOLwh4+T+r2L0hxB7vm_ix0gL4hwYx9urNoS5VNGqQ@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR01MB1548E213A421B5B679207D09C8AE0@HE1PR01MB1548.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <20161031155436.GV1465@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <00FEC291-7F6F-4F77-9C2C-301BBFA9711B@gmail.com> <20161031161816.GY1465@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <56867E43-0882-4C3A-AA92-C9474C72EF38@gmail.com>
Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote...
> I saw that after I asked the question. It just really stinks.
Keep it down. From an outsider's point of view the decision is more
than understandable. Their interest is only "are there enough people
willing to support powerpc?", and the indications were pretty bad.
Reading the log I cannot see any bias against powerpc in general,
rather the opposite.
Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: