Re: Can I install debian on a e300 board?
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:27:03 +0800
> Von: Bear <jilingshu@gmail.com>
> An: Gerhard Pircher <gerhard_pircher@gmx.net>
> CC: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Can I install debian on a e300 board?
> hi,
> It's amazing! I tried Freescale default Linux image and it also halt!
>
> U-Boot 1.3.0 (Dec 22 2008 - 11:19:29) MPC83XX
>
> Reset Status:
>
> CPU: e300c3, MPC8313E, Rev: 21 at 333.333 MHz, CSB: 166 MHz
> Board: Freescale MPC8313ERDB
> I2C: ready
> DRAM: 128 MB
> FLASH: 8 MB
> NAND: 32 MiB
> In: serial
> Out: serial
> Err: serial
> Net: TSEC0, TSEC1 [PRIME]
> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
> =>
> => setenv serverip 192.168.0.104
> => setenv loadaddr 0x01000000
> => dhcp
> Speed: 100, full duplex
> BOOTP broadcast 1
> DHCP client bound to address 192.168.0.103
> Using TSEC1 device
> TFTP from server 192.168.0.104; our IP address is 192.168.0.103
> Filename 'uImage'.
> Load address: 0x1000000
> Loading: #################################################################
> ##############################################
> done
> Bytes transferred = 1617371 (18addb hex)
> => bootm 0x01000000
> ## Booting image at 01000000 ...
> Image Name: Linux-2.6.23
> Created: 2008-12-22 3:22:49 UTC
> Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed)
> Data Size: 1617307 Bytes = 1.5 MB
> Load Address: 00000000
> Entry Point: 00000000
> Verifying Checksum ... OK
> Uncompressing Kernel Image ... OK
>
> The default kernel should be boot correctly, but it also make my board
> hang. Is there anybody can give me some advice? Thanks!
I would check, if U-Boot really hands over a device tree to the kernel
(the "fdt" command may be of use here). Otherwise you may have to load
a device tree file manually and specify its address as an argument for
the bootm command (if that is supported by your U-Boot version).
Gerhard
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
Reply to: