Re: What is pbbuttonsd used for nowadays?
- To: Stefan Monnier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: What is pbbuttonsd used for nowadays?
- From: Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:15:47 +0100
- Message-id: <20090202151547.GC9930@country.nixsys.be>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20090130094116.GA7364@anguilla.debian.or.at> <20090130095147.GA13400@thor.local> <email@example.com> <20090130134628.GA13497@thor.local> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:21:48PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> - backlight dimming is handled by gnome
> >> - "function" keys are very well handled by xorg & gnome
> >> - suspend to ram is handled by gnome-power-manager
> >> What else do you need ?
> > Not everyone's using Gnome.
> I'm not arguing for/against pbbuttonsd. I just see that a lot of what
> it provides is already provided in a machine-agnostic way by other parts
> of the system (be it Gnome/KDE or more core parts of the system).
The fact that they are machine-agnostic does have its issues. One of the
upsides of pbbuttonsd (in my opinion) is that in its default
configuration, it actually matches what's printed on my keyboard: if I
hit the 'volume down' key, it will actually lower the volume -- without
the need for any configuration.
For all the other options out there, I have to manually configure
things. Not that I don't know how to do that, but it's easier if I don't
Pbbuttonsd also knows about some apple-specific features that the
machine-agnostic things don't know about, such as keyboard backlight
All that makes it more interesting than any of the alternatives on apple
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22