On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:58:48AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > On 3/8/06, Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > > > There is a patch wmv3-support-via-vc1.diff.gz in > > > http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001545.html for adding wmv3 > > > support. > > > I have just tested it (rebuild packages from mplayer-g4 source) and it works. > > > But I don't understand well the license in this patch. Can somebody > > > tell me if I can use it ? > > Any reason why this shouldn't be applied to mplayer upstream? Could you > > ask on mplayer-dev? > > On his web site, the author said "the patch may have problem for > upstream (and he will discuss this later)". > [quote] patch 要進官方或許可能有問題 (稍後再談) [/quote] > > My English is not good for well understanding the license of libvc1 > (used in the patch). I would like to be sure that it is legal for > using this patch. I doubt that it can go into mplayer CVS with the current license but that's probably something the mplayer developers should discuss with the author of the patch, could you contact them? Cheers, -- Guido
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature