Re: ANN: apple motion sensor reverse engineered
- To: Stelian Pop <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com, Bernhard Reiter <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <email@example.com>, Jochen Voss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: ANN: apple motion sensor reverse engineered
- From: Johannes Berg <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:57:03 +0200
- Message-id: <1125334623.7229.9.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <1124450471.24118.12.camel@localhost> <email@example.com> <1125052369.6370.23.camel@localhost> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1125053749.11844.27.camel@localhost> <email@example.com> <1125158302.6539.1.camel@localhost> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 10:36 +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this here. Suspending with the ams driver loaded
> works just fine.
Hm, ok. I'll watch out for it more. Maybe it is relevant that I use
suspend2? (I doubt it, but...)
> However, I do BAD interrupts in /proc/interrupts, but I have them even
> without loading my driver, and they are comming coming at about 30 Hz
> (this goes down to 5 Hz after the first suspend/resume cycle). I don't
> know if this comes from some recent kernel change or if I toggled
> something in the hardware while doing the dev...
Odd as well, but I do get bad interrupts too, but far less than 5 Hz.
Well, thanks for the answer, I'll be watching this and come back with
more info once I have some.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part