Re: ANN: apple motion sensor reverse engineered
- To: Stelian Pop <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com, Bernhard Reiter <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <email@example.com>, Jochen Voss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: ANN: apple motion sensor reverse engineered
- From: Johannes Berg <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:58:22 +0200
- Message-id: <1125158302.6539.1.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <1124450471.24118.12.camel@localhost> <email@example.com> <1125052369.6370.23.camel@localhost> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1125053749.11844.27.camel@localhost> <email@example.com>
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:13 +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
> Done in 0.02 available from my page. Actually I didn't bother to start
> the thread only when the input device is accessed but made a toggle
> (sysfs or module parameter based) to actually enable or disable the
> input device).
Cool. You *definitely* want to fix/add suspend handling (unless you did
that in 0.02, which I don't have yet), it was just using 72% CPU time
used for just hard interrupts (all as BAD in /proc/interrupts though),
until I shut down my machine (which took few minutes).
So a word of caution for now: unload this driver when you suspend.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part