Paul Brossier wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:45:39AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:Am I the only who got impressed?No, I am also running a 2.6.12-rc4 and I found it very stable, with much improvements over the 2.6.9+patch7. Software suspend and usb are no more a problem, at worst all it takes is a hotplug restart for some devices to wake up. And with a .config derived from the derived stock kernels, the transition was really smooth.
Ok, you've made me curious. I want to try it, as I run now 2.6.9+sleep7.So, in order to take 2.6.12-rc4, I will need 2.6.11.9 [1] and the patch for 2.6.12-rc4[2] that applies over it, right?
Whatever: Thanks a lot to the kernel developpers (You know who you are ... :)indeed, props to them :)
Maybe kudos ? :-) [1]http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.9.tar.bz2 [2]http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/patch-2.6.12-rc4.bz2 -- Regards, EddyP =========================== I had a favourite quote, but I forgot it. And it was insightful.