[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian ppc64

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 13:50 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:

It is of course true that some other distributions put 32 bit libraries
in /usr/lib and 64 bit libraries in /usr/lib64. I will not follow that path because for a native 64 bit distribution this will lead to an almost empty /usr/lib directory while all the native libraries are in /usr/lib64. In other words this would mean to change the name of the well established '/usr/lib' hierarchy to '/usr/lib64'. This would be ugly, at least IMHO.

I'm still rather unsure of the interest of having the ppc64 distribution
be native... Unlike amd64, as I wrote several times, there is no benefit
as in more registers etc... All you'll get is bigger/slower code...

Oh. There's no ppc64? Aaaah. I assumed it was 64-bit. I am interested in getting ppc64 distribution. Though, then if there's no real performance gain, then I guess this is a moot point.

I vaguely recall long ago in another proccessor architecture, Alpha, there was a handbook about building optimized code for that platform to get significant performance gains, like how for loops are created and 64-bit aligned data, etc. I don't know if any of that would be applicable for the G5 architecture. Still, I can't for the life of me imagine 32bit code running like/similar speeds of 64bit code, and gain no perfomance. Hmpf! :-(

Reply to: