Re: which kernel-image to use?
- To: "J. MacPhail" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: which kernel-image to use?
- From: Michel Dänzer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:21:14 +0100
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20040130074749.GA12099@thing-one.localdomain>
- References: <20040130074749.GA12099@thing-one.localdomain>
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 08:47, J. MacPhail wrote:
> Second, my first try at installing ALSA ran into a problem, helpfully
> pointed out by insmod, that I was using a gcc of inappropriate vintage
> compared to the kernel image. Running "dpkg-deb --info" does not tell
> what gcc version was used to compile a package. How was I supposed to
See /usr/share/doc/kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc*/buildinfo.gz .
> Third, when I let the debian/rules from the alsa-source package guess
> the kernel version, it guessed "KVERS=2.4.22", resulting in modules
> being install in /lib/modules/2.4.22/alsa/ rather than the correct
> /lib/modules/2.4.22-powerpc/alsa/. This presumably is a bug either in
> alsa-source or in kernel-patch-*-powerpc, but which??
alsa-source IMHO, it should default to something like
/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build instead of /usr/src/linux for KSRC.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer