Re: usbfs devmode problem on 2.6.1-ben1
Le mer 21/01/2004 à 11:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 04:22, mammique wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i try to use an usb digital camera on an AlBook under debian unstable
> > with kernel 2.6.1-ben1. Gphoto2 works well as root but not as normal
> > user, usbfs seems to be mounted correctly with devmode=0666 wich should
> > provide access to usb device r/w for normal user :
>
> I've had this problem before, though I didn't quite figure out what
> was going on (I admit I didn't spend a lot of time investigating
> neither).
>
> Could you fwd to the usb-devel list ?
>
Done, i attached the reply :-)
> If you don't get an answer there, I'll try to find some time to
> investigate myself again. I'm quite busy lately though...
>
> Ben.
--
mammique <mammique@lamenagerie.com>
--- Begin Message ---
- To: mammique <mammique@lamenagerie.com>
- Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
- Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [Fwd: usbfs devmode problem on 2.6.1-ben1]
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:34:39 -0800
- Message-id: <20040121233439.GC1793@kroah.com>
- In-reply-to: <1074710447.847.70.camel@PlasticBertrand>
- References: <1074710447.847.70.camel@PlasticBertrand>
Content-Description: Message transféré - usbfs devmode problem on 2.6.1-ben1
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:22:22 +0100
> From: mammique <mammique@lamenagerie.com>
> To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
> Subject: usbfs devmode problem on 2.6.1-ben1
>
> Hi,
>
> i try to use an usb digital camera on an AlBook under debian unstable
> with kernel 2.6.1-ben1. Gphoto2 works well as root but not as normal
> user, usbfs seems to be mounted correctly with devmode=0666 wich should
> provide access to usb device r/w for normal user :
>
> # mount
> /dev/hda4 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
> proc on /proc type proc (rw)
> devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
> /dev/hda6 on /home type ext3 (rw)
> sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
> usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw,devmode=0666)
>
> OK, but if i look at real perms on filesystem :
>
> $ ls -la /proc/bus/usb/001/
> total 0
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 20 15:37 .
> drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Jan 20 15:37 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43 Jan 20 15:37 001
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Jan 20 15:37 002
>
> it seems the devmode=0666 perms were not applied. Does somebody knows
> why ? Is it a bug ?
It is a bug. Look at http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1418 for
more information.
Sorry,
greg k-h
--- End Message ---
Reply to: