Re: 2.6-test1 on ppc?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:39:33PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
> > > on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
> > > kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
> > > impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
> > > identical (right, Sven?).
> >
> > False, Dan told me to use the linuxppc_2_4 tree, and that someone else
> > was packaging the benh tree. I don't know who though, and probably it is
> > not an official package.
>
> What is the difference between linuxppc_2_4 and benh-stable? Not much, I'd
> hope ...
I don't really know, Benjamin may respond to this one, maybe but even
his response let me a bit confuse. linuxppc_2_4 is what get's advertized
on penguinppc.org though.
> There's kernel-patch-benh by Jens Schmalzing, how about using that to
> build a kernel-image-benh package?
Are you sure it doesn't do so already ? Have you not tried building from
it ? Or doing a make-kpkg with it ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: