Re: 2.6-test1 on ppc?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> > kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh
> > package in Debian?
>
> You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
> on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
> kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
> impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
> identical (right, Sven?).
False, Dan told me to use the linuxppc_2_4 tree, and that someone else
was packaging the benh tree. I don't know who though, and probably it is
not an official package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: