[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Apple vs IBM



Hi,

I would surely imagine that teh RS/6000 is tons more scaleable than the
powerMac or Athlon and would have fewer I/O bottlenecks. Tell me something
how many 604e's are included in that $9K price.

Best,

simon

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 debian@computerdatasafe.com.au wrote:

> I have here a PowerMac 7300/200. It's CPU is, according to the kernel, a
> PPC 604e at 200 Mhz.
> 
> It's CPU performance is nothing flash, my Athlon beats it hands down as
> I'd expect.
> 
> Then I see this:
> http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/pseries/hardware/workstations/
> 
> 	
> RS/6000 43P Model 150 
> from $8,805.00 IBM Web price*
> Monitor not included
> Power, performance and expandability to fit your budget.
> · Choice of 250 or 375MHz PowerPC 604e
> processors
> · Starting with 128MB and growing to 1GB of
> memory
> · Ultra2 SCSI disk support/SSA RAID disk support
> · Supports GXT135P and GXT4500P graphics
> 
> 
> Now, 250 Mhz isn't a lot more than 200 Mhz. Sure its disk is faster, and
> its a more-nicely specced machine, but it still has basically the same
> CPU as is in my six-year-old Powermac. about the same age as my Pentium
> II-233 system.
> 
> What's special about this IBM kit to justify its price?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Cheers
> John Summerfield
> 
> Please, no off-list mail at all at all. This address accepts mail only
> from Debian addresses.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 



Reply to: