Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
This one time, at band camp, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>AGP GART is faster (and as we all know, faster is better :) - in fact,
>on newer TiBooks PCI GART is pathetically slow, even much slower than
>with DRI disabled (for 2D, 3D might be slightly faster than software
>rendering). My guess has been this is somehow related to the L3 cache,
>what kind of performance do people get with PCI GART on an iBook with an
>M7?
Okay. With my (very simple) test, I couldn't tell the difference. I'd
better fix up the powerpc bugs in quake2 and do some "testing". :-)
--
jaq@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~jaq
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Brett Carter <brett@kavi.com>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Brett Carter <brett@kavi.com>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Jamie Wilkinson <jaq@debian.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Jamie Wilkinson <jaq@debian.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Jamie Wilkinson <jaq@debian.org>
- Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9
- From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>