On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 05:36:53AM -0300, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 04:47:07AM -0300, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti > > > >> No, no no. Mach can't support an userland all by itself, it needs servers; in > >>Mac OS X, these servers are just one, and it is the BSD kernel minus the > >>low-level hardware interface part. > > > > you are wrong. > > This is no argument, so I don't need to answer... but here it goes. > > Mach isn't a kernel, it is a microkernel. i know that. > > Not only userland, but kernel also. From BSD, I just don't know which version. > BSD is much bigger and older than FreeBSD. they did NOT use the bsd kernel. that is a myth propagated by slashdot mostly. > And it's not stolen. The BSD license allows for what NeXT did. the BSD licence allows corporations to steal with impunity. its still stealing. > But the kernel itself, BSD is more mature. not on powerpc -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpQhpO9Zm5H5.pgp
Description: PGP signature