Re: TiBook Dual Display
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 09:06, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > (this would imply UseFBDev probably?).
> >
> > Depends if the implementation of the two heads is done in the
> > framebuffer device or in the X server driver.
>
> Yep. The chances of me ever mucking with the X server driver are zero, the
> chances of mucking with the fb code are just slim (and that wouldn't be on
> r128 anyway, just scouting out some ideas).
Well, for Mach64, doing this in the framebuffer device is really useless
for X (unless someone implements generic support for framebuffer
devices) because the atimisc driver doesn't support UseFBDev.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Reply to: