Re: HFS+ (MacOS) in contrast to EXT2 (Linux-i386)
Sven wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:14:57AM -0700, Laurent de Segur wrote:
> > What you are saying about ReiserFS is really unfortunate. When I
> > read the archive, there is no question that XFS is a lot more
> > reliable than ReiserFS. On the other hand, It seems that the Linux
> > community is promoting heavily ReiserFS vs XFS/JFS, and that seems
> > totally contradictory with the feedback I got so far.
>
> But then, i have one of those 40 GB IBM drives that might, or might
> not, have problems, with my previous disk, i had no problem, but i
> died during a apt-get run, not sure if it is related to reiserfs or
> something as i just did upgrade kernels, before that, i had no problem > with reiserfs,
Neither did I until it decided to suddenly eat all the data on that
partition. (It also happened during a dist-upgrade, but I guess that's
just coincidence ;) I have no reason to believe there is a problem with
the disk.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Reply to: