On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:14:57AM -0700, Laurent de Segur wrote: > What you are saying about ReiserFS is really unfortunate. When I read the > archive, there is no question that XFS is a lot more reliable than ReiserFS. > On the other hand, It seems that the Linux community is promoting heavily > ReiserFS vs XFS/JFS, and that seems totally contradictory with the feedback > I got so far. ReiserFS is all about hype, of course it will be more popular. > It's too bad that the XFS module (at least on ppc) is not part of the > pre-compiled kernel image (ReiserFS is), and that the XFS kernel patches lag > a few kernel revs behind, making it mostly obsolete by the time you have to > install it on the latest 2.4 kernel (don't know about 2.2.x but can't afford > this alternative due to platform support.) someone just needs to maintain a kernel-patch-xfs -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpHntkwnUxBr.pgp
Description: PGP signature