Re: HFS+ (MacOS) in contrast to EXT2 (Linux-i386)
on 9/13/01 2:02 PM, Otto Wyss at otto.wyss@bluewin.ch wrote:
> I leave it up to you to draw any conclusion.
I am not sure if we can draw any conclusions from individual and isolated
cases. I found ext2 extremely reliable so far. Most boo boo I had happened
with HFS in the past (but then I was using it extensively and Mac OS crashes
more than Linux too), so YMMV.
BeFS which I was running until I switched permanently to Debian recently was
#1 on my own rating scale in terms of reliability and transparency (never
had to run a utility to check the partition for the past 3 years.)
Talking of which... Is anyone using one of the journaling fs (Reiser, XFS,
JFS) on PowerPC daily and having some comments they would like to report? I
was planning on switching to ReiserFS or XFS for my home dir. Which one, if
any, would be the most stable?
Laurent
Reply to: