On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:58:20PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote: > > don't forget sed and nano-tiny! Is the controversy over, and > nano-tiny just nano now, or was there a just plain nano all along? > Inquiring minds... boot-floppies now use nano-tiny, we have taken ae out back and shot it in the head, then we let the `traceroute should be in /usr/bin!' people go out and beat it's dead carcus until there was nothing left that could remotly be recognizable. i don't know whats different about nano vs nano-tiny, other then one being smaller then the other. they are both far to crippled for my tastes. (but at least they don't suck mountains through coffee stirrers like ae does). -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpiQUrzn8tte.pgp
Description: PGP signature