Re: devfs support in ofpath: criteria for patches
"Ethan Benson" <erbenson@alaska.net> writes:
> 6) it must be a shell function say unfuckdevfs() that is called with
> one argument: /dev/retarded/devfs/name and outputs a normal, unix
> compliant terse name (eg: standard linux device name). i will almost
> certainly not accept a huge patch reworking all of ofpath solely to
> cater to devfs.
>
> > Right. But that's not the default config. :)
>
> correct, the default config is CONFIG_FS_DEVFS=n as it should be ;-)
Hey Ethan,
I take it that your not completely happy with devfs? Is this something
more than long path names?
jas.
Reply to: