Re: ofpath, please test
On 17 May, this message from Ethan Benson echoed through cyberspace:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:47:56PM +0200, Michel Lanners wrote:
>> Here you are for my 7600/132; one internal SCSI disk, one internal IDE
>> disk on a Promise Ultra/66:
[snip]
>> [mlan@piglet ~]$ ofpath /dev/sdc|od -a
>> ofpath: /dev/sdc: Device not configured
>> 0000000
>> [mlan@piglet ~]$ ofpath /dev/hda|od -a
>> ofpath: Unsupported device: /dev/hda
>> 0000000
>
> i assume this is the add on promise card? finding the path to this is
> probably non-trivial, and likly impossible if you boot via BootX.
Sure, since there's no FCODE in there (i386 board), it's unbootable
anyway.... Just wanted to see what it spits out ;-)
>> What doesn't look so good is that it gives a path for /dev/sdb (but
>> there's no such device).
>
> the scsi detection stuff is a huge kludge. can you send me the
> contents of /proc/scsi/scsi and /proc/partitions ?
[mlan@piglet ~]$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: DCAS-34330 Rev: S65A
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 03 Lun: 00
Vendor: MATSHITA Model: CD-ROM CR-8008 Rev: 8.0e
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
[mlan@piglet ~]$ cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
8 0 4233600 sda
8 1 50 sda1
8 2 512 sda2
8 3 60 sda3
8 4 153600 sda4
8 5 65536 sda5
8 6 307200 sda6
8 7 307200 sda7
8 8 102400 sda8
8 9 512000 sda9
8 10 307200 sda10
8 11 512000 sda11
8 12 1048576 sda12
8 13 256000 sda13
8 14 661265 sda14
3 0 9873360 hda
3 1 1 hda1
3 5 102753 hda5
3 6 768064 hda6
3 7 102784 hda7
3 8 256504 hda8
3 9 512032 hda9
3 10 102784 hda10
3 11 768064 hda11
3 12 256000 hda12
3 13 256000 hda13
3 14 1048288 hda14
3 15 256000 hda15
3 16 409720 hda16
3 17 409720 hda17
3 18 4624168 hda18
> what disks do you really have?
See /proc/scsi/scsi above. Exactly one SCSI, one IDE, plus the cdrom.
> for a 7200 i assume the internal scsi
> hard disk and a scsi CDROM, so you should have at least /dev/sda and
> /dev/sdb no?
Well I suppose it mistakes the cdrom for sdb; it probably shouldn't,
since there is no second SCSI disk....
Cheers
Michel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art.
23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes.
L-1710 Luxembourg |
email mlan@cpu.lu |
http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. "
Reply to: