Re: potato->woody upgrade.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:10:33PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid is)
> > but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will be filled
> > up with packages from unstable which don't have (too many) critical bugs. I
> > guess it's again a problem of the PPC autobuilder lagging (if there is even
> > any for testing yet?).
>
> OK, this one I -refuse- to take the blame for! :)
>
> That's not how testing works. You don't build for testing; you build
> for unstable. Packages don't move into testing until they have
> sufficiently few RC bugs and build for all released architectures for
> which a previous version built - that means that not much is going into
> testing until we get glibc 2.2 built on arm and m68k, which should be
> soon.
So people tracking woody previously should put now unstable or sid in their
apt source file ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: