Re: What's happening with atomic.h??

To: Nick Bailey <n.bailey@elec.gla.ac.uk>
Cc: "debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org" <debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: What's happening with atomic.h??
From: David Brown <debian-powerpc@davidb.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:03:07 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000927130307.A14258@opus.davidb.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 39D25841.AD5B86F@elec.gla.ac.uk>; from n.bailey@elec.gla.ac.uk on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:27:45PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 39D12616.DA9503A0@uleth.ca> <[🔎] 39D2310F.C1C14972@mit.edu> <[🔎] 39D25841.AD5B86F@elec.gla.ac.uk>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:27:45PM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
> What's going on in include/asm-ppc/atomic.h??
> 
> There's no inline code!!

The 2.4 kernels have inline in the .h file.  For the earlier kernels, the
routines are in arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S

Dave Brown

Reply to:

References:
- raid troubles
  - From: "Jeremiah Merkl" <merkjj@uleth.ca>
- Re: raid troubles
  - From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
- What's happening with atomic.h??
  - From: Nick Bailey <n.bailey@elec.gla.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: debian: C library man pages
Next by Date: Re: raid troubles
Previous by thread: What's happening with atomic.h??
Next by thread: Re: raid troubles
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread